Português
Recently, Pablo Marçal, a candidate for São Paulo Mayor, received a notification from the Electoral Court that could jeopardize his candidacy. The decision by Judge Murilo Dávila of the São Paulo Second Electoral Zone was prompted by a giveaway of a cap conducted by Marçal during one of his campaign events.
During a debate on TV Bandeirantes, Marçal wore a cap with the letter "M" and announced a giveaway among his followers. The method involved asking followers to tag three friends in the comments to enter the cap giveaway. However, this action caught the attention of candidate Tábata and subsequently led to a formal complaint to the Electoral Court.
The complaint is based on the allegation that distributing gifts could be considered a form of vote buying, a practice prohibited by electoral legislation. Judge Murilo Dávila decided to notify Marçal, indicating that the action could be interpreted as early electoral campaigning and, therefore, irregular.
This situation occurs at a time when the race for São Paulo Mayor is highly competitive, with Marçal showing growth in opinion polls. The political landscape has been marked by intense competition, and the court's decision could significantly impact Marçal's campaign strategy.
It is crucial for candidates to be aware of electoral regulations to avoid similar issues and ensure a campaign within the legal boundaries set by the Electoral Court. The notification received by Marçal is an example of how seemingly harmless actions can have significant repercussions during the election period.
